<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: cirrus sitelet vs. cessna sitelet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sportaviationmarketing.com/2005/11/10/cirrus-sitelet-vs-cessna-sitelet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sportaviationmarketing.com/2005/11/10/cirrus-sitelet-vs-cessna-sitelet/</link>
	<description>A weblog to help strengthen businesses in the sport aviation industry.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 05:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sport Aviation Marketing &#187; columbia aircraft promotions</title>
		<link>http://www.sportaviationmarketing.com/2005/11/10/cirrus-sitelet-vs-cessna-sitelet/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Sport Aviation Marketing &#187; columbia aircraft promotions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2006 21:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sportaviationmarketing.com/?p=11#comment-21</guid>
		<description>[...] Are the promotions all good? No. As with the Cirrus sitelet reviewed here and here, the execution of the promotions falls short of the quality one would expect for an airplane priced at $380,000 on the low-end. The flycolumbia.com website, overall, is decent. However, the promotion pages, especially for FlipTheBird123 look more like a children&#8217;s game site. As with Cirrus, this baffles me. The idea is the hard part, and Columbia did a great job in that respect. The execution of those ideas should be easy, why skimp? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Are the promotions all good? No. As with the Cirrus sitelet reviewed here and here, the execution of the promotions falls short of the quality one would expect for an airplane priced at $380,000 on the low-end. The flycolumbia.com website, overall, is decent. However, the promotion pages, especially for FlipTheBird123 look more like a children&#8217;s game site. As with Cirrus, this baffles me. The idea is the hard part, and Columbia did a great job in that respect. The execution of those ideas should be easy, why skimp? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sport Aviation Marketing &#187; Cessna Sitelet Update</title>
		<link>http://www.sportaviationmarketing.com/2005/11/10/cirrus-sitelet-vs-cessna-sitelet/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Sport Aviation Marketing &#187; Cessna Sitelet Update</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2006 04:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sportaviationmarketing.com/?p=11#comment-20</guid>
		<description>[...] Back in November I wrote that the Cessna &#8220;43 Reasons&#8221; campaign was executed nicely but the concept was lacking. Unfortunately, Cessna created a PR nightmare that makes the campaign nearly tragic. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Back in November I wrote that the Cessna &#8220;43 Reasons&#8221; campaign was executed nicely but the concept was lacking. Unfortunately, Cessna created a PR nightmare that makes the campaign nearly tragic. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sport Aviation Marketing &#187; Cirrus Sitelet Update</title>
		<link>http://www.sportaviationmarketing.com/2005/11/10/cirrus-sitelet-vs-cessna-sitelet/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Sport Aviation Marketing &#187; Cirrus Sitelet Update</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2006 03:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sportaviationmarketing.com/?p=11#comment-19</guid>
		<description>[...] A while back I wrote a quick analysis of the Cirrus and Cessna sitelets. At that time, it had been over a year since I had flown commercially. Over the last two weeks I have had four commercial flights with another trip scheduled for next week. I like the &#8220;I am not that guy&#8221; concept even more today than I did back in November. Flying commercially is a nightmare. Put me on the list for an SR22. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A while back I wrote a quick analysis of the Cirrus and Cessna sitelets. At that time, it had been over a year since I had flown commercially. Over the last two weeks I have had four commercial flights with another trip scheduled for next week. I like the &#8220;I am not that guy&#8221; concept even more today than I did back in November. Flying commercially is a nightmare. Put me on the list for an SR22. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Cooper</title>
		<link>http://www.sportaviationmarketing.com/2005/11/10/cirrus-sitelet-vs-cessna-sitelet/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Cooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 18:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sportaviationmarketing.com/?p=11#comment-10</guid>
		<description>O.K., so it is now December 21 (over 1 month since your review of these sitelets). As a designer, I was intrigued by your review, so I visited the referenced sitelets. I was surprised to see that Cessna has yet to reach 43 reasons (as of today, only 9 are available). Does this also speak to the lackluster performance of their sitelet? Is the sitelet lacking &lt;a href="http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/ambient_findability_talking_with_peter_morville" rel="nofollow"&gt;findability&lt;/a&gt;? 

As with many sitelets, the Cessna sitelet is not within the first page of Google results when searching for "cessna,"cessna feature,"cessna specs," etc... If companies are willing to go to the expense of creating a Flash site such as this, wouldn't it benefit them to make it more widely findable by their primary audience?

You made a great point when you eluded that sitelets (and, primary company sites for that matter) related to consumer goods need to meet the consumer at the right point within the decision-making process. As such, the Cessna "reasons" sitelet would be a great tool for consumers in the early comparison stage.

I also found myself let down by the Cirrus "I am not that guy" sitelet. After reading through a few paragraphs of copy I found that the value proposition was strong (for the right audience), but  the subsequent call to action let me asking questions that would need to be answered prior to such time commitments. The sitelet left me asking, "Why couldn't I solve the problem acted out here by purchasing a plane from a competitor?" I could be "not that guy" by purchasing a plane from Cessna as well – and they'll even give me a REASON :)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>O.K., so it is now December 21 (over 1 month since your review of these sitelets). As a designer, I was intrigued by your review, so I visited the referenced sitelets. I was surprised to see that Cessna has yet to reach 43 reasons (as of today, only 9 are available). Does this also speak to the lackluster performance of their sitelet? Is the sitelet lacking <a href="http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/ambient_findability_talking_with_peter_morville" rel="nofollow">findability</a>? </p>
<p>As with many sitelets, the Cessna sitelet is not within the first page of Google results when searching for &#8220;cessna,&#8221;cessna feature,&#8221;cessna specs,&#8221; etc&#8230; If companies are willing to go to the expense of creating a Flash site such as this, wouldn&#8217;t it benefit them to make it more widely findable by their primary audience?</p>
<p>You made a great point when you eluded that sitelets (and, primary company sites for that matter) related to consumer goods need to meet the consumer at the right point within the decision-making process. As such, the Cessna &#8220;reasons&#8221; sitelet would be a great tool for consumers in the early comparison stage.</p>
<p>I also found myself let down by the Cirrus &#8220;I am not that guy&#8221; sitelet. After reading through a few paragraphs of copy I found that the value proposition was strong (for the right audience), but  the subsequent call to action let me asking questions that would need to be answered prior to such time commitments. The sitelet left me asking, &#8220;Why couldn&#8217;t I solve the problem acted out here by purchasing a plane from a competitor?&#8221; I could be &#8220;not that guy&#8221; by purchasing a plane from Cessna as well – and they&#8217;ll even give me a REASON <img src='http://www.sportaviationmarketing.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
